Wednesday, March 26, 2008

The Search for Reliable Information Continues: Scouring the Blogosphere

This week, I have surveyed the Internet for links to diverse, relevant, and reputable websites containing information on the 2008 presidential election. These links may be found in my linkroll. I used the Webby Awards Criteria to assess the overall quality of these web resources and paid especially close attention to the IMSA criteria, which standardizes expectations for weblogs. A bulk of the links come from the blogosphere, an area left relatively unexplored in my earlier post. Before delving into that realm, I will begin with introducing a spectacular visual representation of the primary election results (pictured on the right). Complex quantitative election data is organized in the familiar, simple design of a Google map and is highly interactive.

For readers who are weary about obtaining information from weblogs, an excellent starting point is newspapers. Several major news organizations maintain political blogs and scrutinize the posts for the same objectivity and accuracy as can be found in print articles. Washington Post's The Fix is maintained by a credentialed reporter, Chris Cillizza, who travels to events, posts videos and links, and often invites user interaction. Another excellent Post blog The Trail is a more general election 2008 site maintained by various reporters. The blog shares many similarities to the New York Times' The Caucus in delivering regular posts with reliable information and clear formatting. Generally, though, each site covers unique stories so readers can explore both without encountering excessive overlap. More Internet-savvy readers may prefer weblogs that are more oriented toward the online community, as characterized by having multiple contributors and employing minimal editing. Two popular sources are the Daily Kos and The Huffington Post. While both have several writers, the websites have different accountability checks on their authors. Entries on the Daily Kos are left open-ended, often receiving hundreds of feedback commentary with concurring and dissenting opinions. The Huffington Post similarly sees regular commenting but is further equipped with biographies on the authors, helping readers to assess their credibility. Another category of weblogs comes directly from the campaigns. The major candidates in the race John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama maintain easily accessible blogs in addition to campaign websites. While each has an obvious bias, the posts supply useful links, media, and general campaign information. The Obama campaign presents the most routine updates, followed closely by the Clinton blog. Finally, feeling overwhelmed by the sheer amount of available facts and figures in the World Wide Web is understandable. As a remedy, Comedy Central’s Indecision 2008 website provides a humorous take on the election events. Articles, media, and polls may look like information that is found on any other political website, but Comedy Central provides a lighthearted, humorous, and sometimes satirical take on election events. I hope to have pointed my readers in the right direction, towards useful and engaging sources for 2008 presidential election information.

1 comment:

Antonia Marchette said...

I really enjoyed your post; I found it to be extremely well written. I enjoyed that you organized your links cohesively based on thematic similarities as opposed to simply listing the resources in a confusing way. As someone who uses the internet to learn more about the present election, I found that the links you provided offered a diverse, wide-ranging scope to the plethora of issues that revolve around each candidates’ campaigns. By including a reference to your previous linkroll post, you helped distinguish the importance of this one and how the content differentiated from your previous links. I liked the fact that within your description you directly concerned the reader and what would be helpful for them, rather than just listing links that you found interesting for yourself. You distinguished between “Internet-savvy readers” and “readers who are weary about obtaining information from weblogs”, providing resources that catered to the needs of the specific interest groups that would potentially visit your weblog. The quality of your links was also very enjoyable in that you provided a variety of helpful resources to help those learn more about the election. By describing direct candidate resources, comedic remedial links, and journalists’ stances on the issues revolving around Obama, Clinton, McCain, and Paul, I think that any visitor of your blog will find interest in at least one of your thematic topics. I enjoyed that you acknowledged the bias on the specific candidates’ websites rather than simply providing them because of their obvious credibility. Also, as any presidential election is clearly extensively covered in media outlets across print and digital space, I really liked that you mentioned how although certain websites cover the same theme, they definitely provide different content; you accounted for redundancy, which is extremely helpful for readers who do not want to read the same political topics several times on end. As much as you lauded these weblogs and websites for their content, I think I would have enjoyed some more comments on your part as to how these resources could be improved. Also, I think you could have improved your post by specifically targeting certain elements of Webby and IMSA criteria for each of the resources you listed. However, overall, I enjoyed the wide breadth of your links and your cohesive description.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.